Trump wants someone that is easy for him to ridicule. If Hillary Clinton were in the senate he'd be clammoring for her to be the speaker


Ask me for the clan test!
Sólsetur wrote:
Trump wants someone that is easy for him to ridicule. If Hillary Clinton were in the senate he'd be clammoring for her to be the speaker
Abyss Master wrote:
Trump will just make shit up if he feels like it, so I frankly don't think it would make much of a difference. He's been calling Elizabeth Warren Pocahontas non-stop for I don't even know how long, I don't think he'd need much time or effort to come up with some bullshit for a new Democrat if he had to.Sólsetur wrote:
Trump wants someone that is easy for him to ridicule. If Hillary Clinton were in the senate he'd be clammoring for her to be the speaker
Pietro wrote:
If the results hold in Arizona with Sinema winning and the Democrats manage to flip Florida back. Then a net loss of 1 senate seat isn't actually that bad and gives the Democrats a better chance of winning the senate in 2020 when the map is in their favor.
HeroOfTime5 wrote:
I'm not holding out on Nelson since he somehow has to swing 15,000 votes unless some major errors are found during the manual recount.
Avalanchemike wrote:
A very large number of ballots in Broward (something like 25k ballots, iirc) are currently listed as not having voted for the Senate. A lot of people thing this is suspicious and believe that there could have been an error with the machine reading the votes. At the end of election night, Scott had a 50,000 vote lead. Since then it has narrowed to 15,000 like you've said. The ballots aren't all counted. If the number continues to decrease to the point that it triggers a manual recount we can find out if those ballots truly are unmarked.HeroOfTime5 wrote:
I'm not holding out on Nelson since he somehow has to swing 15,000 votes unless some major errors are found during the manual recount.